Dreamer of the Day ([info]iamo) wrote,
@ 2009-05-27 13:16:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:legislature, participatory democracy, perpetual majority, politics, twitter

Participatory Democracy and Twitter
I was up late last night (not unusual for me lately) watching something kind of amazing unfold. The Alberta Legislature was debating a new version of their human rights legislation that included two major changes:
- on one end of the spectrum, the addition of sexual orientation to protected status'. Technically, this was just a gesture, as sexual orientation has been a protected status in common law for years due to being read in by the courts.
- on the other end, they added the rights of parents to remove their children from classes with content relating to religion, sexuality, and sexual orientation. A right that, by my understanding, was already present in the school act.

Now, Alberta's legislature is a perpetual majority government by the Progressive Conservative party, and that party is capable of essentially controlling all legislation that passes through the house. They really wanted the latter and seemed to think the former would be a good olive branch to prevent argument.

But that's all politics as usual. Simple background information. What happened last night was that somehow, people on twitter were rallied to watch the debate unfold over the streaming video the Alberta government provides of legislature proceedings. If it had just been people on there bitching and moaning, it also wouldn't have been very special.

But last night, there weren't just average citizens participating. There were actually MLAs on twitter discussing and debating with the twitter users. Granted, most of the MLAs participating were backbenchers or otherwise not taking direct part in the debate on the floor, but they were there and they were talking to the very people they represent while making law.

I know that there are people concerned at adding distractions to people on the floor of governing bodies, but I honestly think this should be encouraged. I couldn't help but think I was seeing some element of the future here, where people are moved closer to their representatives in government and able to influence them more directly. And anyone who's ever watched CPAN knows there's plenty of zoning out, reading magazines (one MLA last night was reading a magazine while the MLA next to him was debating), chattering, etc. If their time is going to be wasted, I'd rather it be wasted on us.

I do think the MLAs could stand to learn some of the twitter conventions a bit better. If they'd used hash tags, it would have been easier to follow their discussions. Also, if more of the left side of the house (Libs and NDP) had been on that would have been nice too. I'm a little shocked to see the Conservatives on the forefront of this trend.

If you want to read the discussion on twitter about bill 44, you can go here.




(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]bambamiamtam
2009-05-28 10:51 am UTC (link)
That is really interesting to see. I can't read it because I don't have a twitter account, but that's really cool. I think that you're right, this is hopefully something we'll be seeing more of in the future.

I was up late getting updates on the debate but I decided to half-ass it and just let Laurie's office manager e-mail updates on each amendent...as they all inevitably got shut down, of course. It was neat to see how many people were watching the stream lastnight.

I think the reason that the Libs and NDs aren't twittering with the same vigour as the PCs is simply because it's the PCs that have the time and the emotional energy to do it. The left MLAs have so many portfolios and so much weight on their shoulders, especially the NDs, and twittering just isn't a huge concern. Rachel does a really job of updating her Facebook though. Or maybe someone else does that, but they certainly provide it with a lot of stuff. In the Lib caucus, half of them definitely don't give a crap about social media and the other half just do not have the time or resources to do it. At this point Laurie doesn't want a Twitter account and I'm hoping it stays that way, because I'd be the one having to update it. But if Twitter doesn't get old soon, guess I'll have to.

I don't think you'll ever get PC MLAs that understand hash tags. They can update their accounts because someone set up a phone for them. That's it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]iamo
2009-05-28 07:52 pm UTC (link)
Huh. Didn't realize you'd need to be logged in to use that search link. How about this one?

I think twitter is far more suited to this kind of purpose for politicians than facebook. Facebook is always a closed book, people are hidden unless sought out. Including people trying to broadcast themselves. Twitter allows people to engage politicians they don't agree with and would never put themselves as "fans" of. So facebook allows them to preach to the choir, while twitter allows somewhat more real engagement. There are fewer people on twitter, but they are on average more politically engaged.

I think things like this could in the long run really benefit the liberals and the ndp, but only if they play it right. In general, they don't do a very good job of convincing people that a strong opposition is important to keeping the ruling party honest, but a few people on twitter were on the verge of being convinced that night that such a thing might be the case.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bambamiamtam
2009-05-31 05:27 am UTC (link)
That one worked, thank you! I'm going to pass it along.

You're right that Twitter is better suited for chatting, especially since people actually use their phones for it on a regular basis, much more so than Facebook. There's nothing wrong with Twitter, I just wish Twitter and Facebook could comebine because it's getting overwhelming.

I really don't think the NDs and Liberals will take it on unless they absolutely have to. Sometimes I'm not sure how Notley and Mason do it. They must run on batteries.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]otakukitty
2009-06-06 02:58 am UTC (link)
I'm glad to hear that people were avidly taking interest in the webfeed.
My dad is actually in charge of that, and I was filling in for him that night, switching the cameras and stuff. Sure, I was there until 4am, but I think it was worth it. I thought it was really interesting, too.

(Reply to this)


(4 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…